top of page

albertbuttigieg.com

English

Malti

© 2025 Albert Buttigieg. All rights reserved.

Partit Nazzjonalista

Partit Nazzjonalista

@buttigiegalbert

@buttigiegalbert

@ButtigiegAlbert

@ButtigiegAlbert

Recent Articles
Are we now a neurotic nation?

Are we now a neurotic nation?

While the Labour government frequently highlights our resilient economy, many people are left wondering: at what cost? People are constantly on edge and ready to flare up. Credit: Shutterstock.com Although Malta is thriving economically, a closer look reveals growing signs of social strain, signs that are not only becoming increasingly visible but are also leaving lasting marks on the daily lives of many. It seems that more people are constantly on edge, irritable and ready to flare up at the...

16/12/25

It-tfal kollha kollha tagħna!

It-tfal kollha kollha tagħna!

Il-kelma ‘inklużjoni’ tikxef mentalità fejn KULĦADD huwa ugwali. Din l-ugwaljanza ġejja mill-prinċipju fundamentali li lkoll kemm għandna l-istess dinjità umana. Issa, din id-dinjità ma tiddependix mill-abilitajiet differenti li wieħed jista’ jkollu. Credit: Rawpixel / envato.com Id-dinjità umana hija l-essenza ta’ dak li jagħmilna bnedmin. Dan huwa valur intrinsiku. Jista’ ma jkollix idejn, ma nismax, ma narax IMMA xorta jiena persuna umana daqs ħaddiehor li għandu idejn, jisma’ u jara....

06/12/25

Il-fond ta’ investiment għat-tfal: Proposta għaqlija

Il-fond ta’ investiment għat-tfal: Proposta għaqlija

Dan l-aħħar il-Partit Nazzjonalista nieda proposta li jkun hemm fond għal kull wild ġdid li jitwieled. B’hekk kull wild, irripettivament mill-familja tiegħu. Jibda’ l-ħajja bl-istess opportunità.

25/11/25

BLOG
Albert Buttigieg in St Julian's

Is rebranding wearing off?

  • manuelschembri
  • Dec 17, 2015
  • 3 min read

Many feel disillusioned and are no longer impressed by Labour's slick spin and gloss.


ree

The last general election was historical. Never before in Malta had a political party garnered a victory with a 36,000-vote margin. The Labour Party was under great pressure to win the elections. It had no choice. It was either do or die.

Losing once again would have been catastrophic for the party. It would have meant either closing shop or condemning the party to be unelectable. On the other hand, after years of Nationalist administration, the people wanted to experience change.

Many were reluctant to trust the old Labour Party and its way of doing politics. Many were still traumatised by the bad governance, cronyism, corruption and repressive tactics of old Labour. Certain Labour stalwarts were a constant reminder of the party’s darkest hours.

Upon assuming leadership, Joseph Muscat was determined to change all this. As a former media man, he knew very well that in politics perception counts. He wanted to change the negative image. What followed was a slick, expensive marketing campaign that gradually transformed the image of the Labour Party.

Labour updated its emblem. It replaced the boilers suits with elegant suits and blue ties. Stereotyped images of supporters made way for new, well-groomed, good-looking young faces. It did not stop there. The biggest challenge was in rebranding its policies and attitudes.

The party promised transparency, accountability and meritocracy as a way of good governance. It tapped successfully into the nation’s subconscious desires. Transparency, accountability and meritocracy are how we as a nation want politics to be. As a nation, we have a deep desire to see holders of office held responsible for their doings, govern in a transparent way and only promote those who merit rather than those who with connections. Back then, this was music to the ears of disgruntled Nationalists, tired of all that their party represented. What followed is history. Almost three years down the line, is this rebranding wearing off? Various indications point to the affirmative. Labour successfully rebranded its image, but it seems it failed to change its core. Change for the sake of change is no change.

The ever-growing list of scandals, stories of cronyism, clientelism, sleaze, pseudo-consultancies, hefty salaries or promotions to party loyalists, secret dealings, aggressiveness towards opponents, subtle or overt vindictiveness at workplaces, bad governance, accommodating certain shady characters and entrepreneurs, are making Labour’s true colours shine once again. The slick marketing rebranding is wearing off. The leopard never changes its spots. Is the old Labour back to haunt and traumatise us once more?

Although the Labour administration must be credited with a number of good initiatives, like continuing previous economic policies and tackling overdue social issues, many genuine labour supporters, genuine switchers and past disgruntled Nationalists are coming to realise that Labour won them over with gimmicks and sweet talk.

Many feel disillusioned and are no longer impressed by Labour’s slick spin and gloss. Many had truly hoped that Labour would change things. Now many are realising that nothing has changed except the actors. Labour is reading the same old script. Many feel cheated. Others are identifying with the real-life scenario in which on one side there is a salesman feeling proud that he successfully sold an inferior product, and on the other side, a consumer feeling angry at being cheated.

I am sure that in the next election, the Labour government will try to buy some lost love and use the power of incumbency to rally support. Fooled once, can I be fooled twice, Joe Public may ask? During house visits, people from the security and discretion of their homes are expressing disgust and disappointment. All promises of meritocracy, transparency and accountability are turning out to be hollow. Trying to justify the present mismanagement and abuses by harping on past mistakes is becoming boring. Trying to bring up the past to make the present look less bad is not convincing, in particular to those who were promised that Labour would usher in a new way of doing politics.

The latest to realise this dishonesty is Marlene Farrugia. She represents the voice of many disgruntled Labourites and genuine switchers. I always applaud those who have the courage to stand up and be counted. Farrugia is insisting that what the then Labour opposition used to strongly criticise is now being replayed by the incumbent government. She is demanding that Labour be consistent and walk the talk. The aggressive and cynical reactions from the Labour quarters, in particular, comments made by Joe Debono Grech, continue to show that Labour’s rebranding is wearing off quicker than we thought. Politics is more than spin and gloss.


(This article was published on Times of Malta – 17 December, 2015)

BACK
bottom of page